Legal Opinion

Wulf v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1999No. 98-CC-0111Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Epstein, J.

This claim for attorneys fees against the Respondents Department of Revenue (“IDR”), based on the common fund doctrine, is before us on the Respondents motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. This motion was briefed and orally argued to the full Court.

Because this claim involves the conduct of a Circuit Court probate proceeding and fee awards entered therein, this Court directed the parties to supplement the record on the pending motion with additional documentation of those proceedings (order of November 5, 1998), which both parties did. Following oral argument,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Scholtens v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Brundidge v. Glendale Federal Bank, F.S.B.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Garimella v. Board of Trustees of the University of IllinoisCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1996
  4. In Re Estate of PfoertnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. In re WardCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API