Legal Opinion

Markley v. Semle

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 23, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

713 A.2d 945 (1998)

1998 ME 145

John E. MARKLEY, et al.

v.

Scott B. SEMLE, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted on Briefs December 23, 1998.

Decided June 10, 1998.

James A. Hopkinson, Portland, for plaintiffs.

Richard A. Hull, III, Biddeford, for defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, LIPEZ, and SAUFLEY, JJ.

LIPEZ, Justice.

[¶ 1] The plaintiffs, John and Mary Markley, appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche J.) in favor of the defendants, Scott and Debra Semle. The Markleys contend, inter alia, that the court erred in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Ollison v. Village of Climax SpringsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Chappell v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Mariello v. GiguereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API