Legal Opinion

Estate of McJunkin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 14, 1955No. Docket No. 34185Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Pierce, Judge:

We approve respondent’s determination. Accordingly, we hold that the benefits of section 107 (a) of the Internal Eevenue Code (1939) are not available to the petitioner.

First, it is to be observed that section 107 (a) provides for allocation of compensation included in the gross income; whereas the petitioner seeks to reduce the decedent’s compensation to a net basis, by deduction of various claimed expenses. It is our opinion that this does not conform with the statute. Cf. Weldon D. Smith, 17 T. C. 135, 144, reversed on other grounds 203 F. 2d 310.

Secondly, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Podems v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  4. Glendinning, McLeish & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API