Imbler v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.
The respondent, a section hand in appellant’s employ, brought this action under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act to recover damages for personal injuries which he sustained by reason of being struck on the face by a track wrench, while riding on onq of the appellant’s motor cars operated on its main railway line in the vicinity of Lamont, "Washington. Respondent in his complaint charged that the appellant negligently failed to furnish him a safe place in which to work, in that the motor car on which he was riding was unequipped with a tool box, or an enclosure or fasteners so as to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Wasioto & Black Mountain Railroad v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- McGinn v. North Coast Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stanke v. Spokane, Coeur D' Alene & Palouse Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935