Coleman v. French
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RODGERS, Justice:
We are of the opinion that the decree of the- chancery court in this case is correct and should be affirmed. This is another one of those cases based upon the misconception that possession of property is sufficient to sustain a claim of ownership by adverse possession. The claim of ownership must have existed at the beginning of the statutory period of possession and not possession with the intent to claim as soon as the statutory period has passed. Taranto v. Peoples Bank of Biloxi, 242 Miss. 607, 136 So.2d 213 (1962); Newman v. Smith, 226 Miss. 465, 84 So.2d 512 (1956);…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ball v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Grantham v. Masonite Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Newman v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Taranto v. Peoples BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ellison v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002
- Biddix v. McConnellMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Blackburn v. WongMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- McDonald v. Board of Mississippi Levee CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1986
- Warehousing Management, LLC v. Haywood Properties, LPCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.