Legal Opinion

Versatex, LLC v. Duracell Manufacturing LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 15, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00184Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI VERSATEX, LLC, et al., : Case No. 1:23-cv-184 Plaintiffs, | Judge Matthew W. McFarland DURACELL MANUFACTURING, LLC, : Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY (Doc. 16) to Stay (Doc. 16). Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 17), to which Defendant filed a Reply in Support (Doc. 18). Thus, this matter is ripe for the Court’s review. For the reasons below, Defendant’s Motion (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. BACKGROUND This case arises from allegedly unpaid…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Stout v. J.D. ByriderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Harley Blanton v. Domino's Pizza Franchising LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API