Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. ROYAL INTERN. PETROLEUM CORP.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 2, 2005No. 2003 CA 2660PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
906 So.2d 627 (2005)
Michael D. HAMILTON
v.
ROYAL INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION and Elmer B. Litchfield, Sheriff & Tax Collector of the City of Baton Rouge.
No. 2003 CA 2660.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
March 2, 2005.
Daniel J. McGlynn, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant Michael D. Hamilton.
Charles G. Blaize, Jr., Baton Rouge, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee Royal International Petroleum Company.
Leu Anne Lester Greco, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee Sheriff Elmer B. Litchfield.
Before: CARTER, C.J., WHIPPLE, PARRO, KUHN, GUIDRY, PETTIGREW, DOWNING, GAIDRY,…
Also in this document: Dissent · Gaidry; Dissent · Gaidry.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Walls v. American Optical Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Mississippi Land Co. v. S & a PROPERTIES IILouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Wells v. JosephSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Sutter v. Dane Investments, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- EAST-WEST OF METAIRIE, INC. v. StewartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009