Gareth A. Bigart v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Gareth A. Bigart sued The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in the District of Vermont for personal injuries. After a four day trial before Judge Gibson, the jury returned a verdict for defendant. Nine days later, Bigart moved for a new trial on the ground, inter alia, that
Plaintiff’s counsel has information and believes that a certain juror or jurors sitting in said cause had formed an opinion as to the result of the trial and expressed same before the evidence was closed and before the Court had delivered its charge to the jury.
At the argument of the motion, plaintiff’s attorney apparently…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Barbarino v. Stanhope S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. Co. v. PetkunasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chappell & Co., Inc., T. B. Harms Company, Williamson Music, Inc., Frank Loesser and Frank Music Corp. v. J. Jay FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Samuel Parkinson, as Custodian for Andrew Parkinson v. April Industries, Inc., and Alex M. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Compagnie Nationale Air France v. The Port of New York Authority, the Lummus Company, the United States of America, and M. Parisi & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Brown v. American Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Daiflon, Inc. v. The Honorable Luther Bohanon, Judge of the United States District Court for Thewestern District of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.