Defnall v. Schoen
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
The defendant contends that counts 1 and 2 of the petition were based upon the theory of malicious' use of process, and that it was necessary to allege that the proceeding complained of had been terminated in favor of the defendant therein, before the suit based upon it was brought. The plaintiff contends that these counts were based upon malicious abuse of process, and that it was not necessary to allege that the proceedings to dispossess him had terminated in his favor. If these two counts were based upon the malicious use of process, it was necessary to allege a termination of the suit in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Porter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Brantley v. Rhodes-Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Mullins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- King v. YarbraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Williams v. AdelmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Dale v. City Plumbing & Heating Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hall v. Field Enterprises, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Rivers v. Dixie Broadcasting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.