Mary Meeks v. Hologic, Inc.

KING, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. After all defendants to the original complaint filed responsive pleadings in Mary Meeks’s medical malpractice suit, Meeks obtained leave of court and filed a first amended, complaint (FAG), adding as a defendant the manufacturer of a medical device, Hologic, Inc. Meeks did not serve the FAG on Hologic but instead filed a second amended complaint (SAG) without leave of court or permission from all defendants.- Hologic filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Meeks’s claims against Ho-logie were federally preempted and that Meeks’s claims additionally were barred…