Legal Opinion

Sarkisyanz v. National Ass'n for Armenian Studies & Research

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 22, 1998Published

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C appeal by the plaintiff of the amount of damages awarded to him after the entry of a default judgment against the defendant. The plaintiff contends that evidence presented by the defendant at the assessment hearing was inadmissible because its consideration was precluded by the default, and because it did not come within the business record exception to the hearsay rule. The plaintiff also argues that it was error for the trial court to fail to award multiple damages and attorney’s fees pursuant to G.Lc. 93A.

In separate paragraphs of his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Nancy P. v. D'AMATOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Multi Technology, Inc. v. Mitchell Management Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API