Legal Opinion

Yesel Ex Rel. Klein v. Watson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBiedzeli., J.

This is an action against a defendant, who was sheriff of Pierce county, and the state bonding fund, to recover damages for false arrest and for assault. The plaintiff alleges in both counts that the officer was bonded in the state bonding fund in the sum of $10,000 in accordance with the terms and provisions of chapter 158, Session Laws of 1919. A copy of the plaintiff’s claim against the fund in the sum of $10,000 is attached to the complaint and incorporated therein by reference. Separate answers were interposed by the defendants and the action was tried in the district court of Ward…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Williams' Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. North v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Nelson v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Hixon v. CuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Phillips v. MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Butler v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Arnold v. State Ex Rel. BurtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. C & I Steel, LLC v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. National Surety Corporation v. GatlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Allen v. CavinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API