Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 2, 1996No. 09-95-212 CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the felony offense of Possession of a Controlled Substance. The record before us reflects that the trial court conducted a pretrial suppression hearing pursuant to appellant’s *681written “Motion To Suppress Evidence Obtained From Illegal Arrest/Detention.” The trial court denied appellant’s suppression motion. Thereafter, appellant pleaded guilty to the charged offense without benefit of a negotiated punishment recommendation. The trial court properly admonished appellant in compliance with Tex.Code CRIM. PROC. Ann. art. 26.13…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dinnery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Jack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. John Eugenio Quinones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API