Legal Opinion

People v. Nottingham

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1985No. Crim. 44844PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

OCHOA, J. *

Appellant Michael Stanley Nottingham was convicted at jury trial of murder in the first degree under the felony-murder rule. (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(17).) The jury found to be true the allegation that appellant committed the murder while engaged in the attempted commission of the crime of rape. (Pen. Code, § 261.) The appellant was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Because the jury was not instructed that it had to find that the appellant had the specific intent to kill in accordance with Carlos v. Superior Court (1983) 35 Cal.3d 131 [197…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HovarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. People v. ZackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Levi Strauss & Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. ZackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API