Legal Opinion

Kesten v. Morris

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

Plaintiff moves, pursuant to sections 150, 151 and 162 of article 11 of the General Corporation Law, and section 974 of article 60 of the Civil Practice Act, for the appointment of a receiver, pendente lite, of the assets and property interests and rights of the corporate defendant and for a temporary injunction against the individual defendants as well as the corporate defendant from selling or otherwise disposing of any of the assets or funds of the corporation.

The action is a derivative suit in equity by plaintiff as a stockholder, officer and director of the defendant corporation Atlantis…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Hy-Lite Plastics, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nadrich v. NagelbergNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API