Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Kennard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 11, 1911PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City. Circuit Court. — Ron. Eugene McQuiliin, Judge. •(1) A trust violating the rule against perpetuities is void, unless the object and purpose of such trust is to create a valid public charity. 2 Perry on Trusts (5 Ed.), sec. 687; 2 Underhill on Wills, 1195; Johnson v. Holifield,- 79 Ala. 423; Troutman v. Orphans’ Home, 66 Kas. 1; Hilliard v. Miller, 10 Pa. St. 326;-Duke of Norfolk’s Case, 1 Vern. 164; Bank v. Longfellow, 96 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City. Circuit Court. — Ron. Eugene McQuiliin, Judge. •(1) A trust violating the rule against perpetuities is void, unless the object and purpose of such trust is to create a valid public charity. 2 Perry on Trusts (5 Ed.), sec. 687; 2 Underhill on Wills, 1195; Johnson v. Holifield,- 79 Ala. 423; Troutman v. Orphans’ Home, 66 Kas. 1; Hilliard v. Miller, 10 Pa. St. 326;-Duke of Norfolk’s Case, 1 Vern. 164; Bank v. Longfellow, 96 Mo. App. 385; Mason v. Perry, 22 R. I. 475; Coit v. Comstock, 51 Conn. 352; Detwiller v. Hartman, 37 N. J. Eq. 347. (2) A trust in which the…

1Opinion of the CourtKennish, J.

— This spit in equity was instituted in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis on the 18th day of August, 1909, by the appellants, as heirs of Robert A. Barnes, deceased, against Samuel M. Kennard, Samuel Cupples and Murray Carleton, as trustees, under the last will and testament of the said Robert A. Barnes. One of the said heirs who did not join as plaintiff was made co-defendant.

By the provisions of the will of the said Robert A. Barnes certain bequests were made to said trustees for the purpose of erecting and maintaining a hospital *?for sick and injured persons, and the purpose of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. VIDAL v. Girard's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Trustees of the Philadelphia Baptist Ass'n v. Hart's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Chambers v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  4. Burbank v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Missouri Historical Society v. Academy of ScienceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dickey v. VolkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Lightfoot v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Nuns of the Third Order v. YounkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Burrier v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. First National Bank of Kansas City v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API