Oklahoma City v. Castleberry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Chief Justice.
There is involved here the correctness of an order of the trial court vacating certain proceedings entered in a condemnation action by default upon the defendants failing to appear. Parties will he referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff, a municipal corporation, on September 24, 1963, filed an action seeking to condemn for use in connection with its waterworks system certain lands owned by the defendants. On the same date plaintiff filed in the case a notice directed to the defendants informing them that the plaintiff would “on the 8th day of October,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carter v. GrimmettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. JansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Sharum v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hale v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hoffman v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knell v. BurnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Smaller v. SmallerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- BJORKMAN v. NOBLESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
- ASSET ACCEPTANCE v. PHAMCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- Knell v. BurnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982