People v. Hull
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Respondent was convicted of murder in the first degree. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The respondent was convicted in the Wayne circuit court, before a jury, of murder in the first degree. The case is brought up on exceptions before sentence.
The claim of respondent's counsel in this Court is:
1. That the court erred in not charging the jury that under the evidence the respondent could not be convicted of murder in the first degree.
2. That there was no evidence on which the respondent could have been justly convicted, and the court should have so instructed the jury; that the court should have granted the motion to quash, and limited the information to one for manslaughter.
3.…
2Cited by22 opinions
- People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. MedcoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. RaiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. AuerbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.