Legal Opinion

Channing v. Seneca-Cayuga Nation

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00458Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SARAH SUE CHANNING, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 23-cv-00458-SH ) SENECA-CAYUGA NATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Federal Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint.1 Plaintiffs seek judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act, con- tending the Secretary of the Interior—through her designees—arbitrarily and capriciously allowed unqualified members of the Seneca-Cayuga Nation to vote in a Secretarial elec- tion. Federal Defendants argue the Court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API