Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Parrish

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 24, 1997No. 77,150Published

1Opinion of the Court

262 Kan. 926 (1997)

942 P.2d 631

JEROD HEIMAN, Appellee,

v.

HEATHER L. PARRISH, Appellant.

No. 77,150.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed July 24, 1997.

Tim J. Moore, of Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, Chartered, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant.

Roger E. McClellan, of Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Swartz, L.L.P., of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MCFARLAND, C.J.:

The issue before us concerns the ownership of an engagement ring after the engagement was terminated.

The case was called for…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Pavlicic v. VogtsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. Brown v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Gill v. ShivelyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API