United States v. Erie R.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
FANNING, District Judge.
This is an action for the recovery of four penalties of $100 each for four alleged violations by the defendant of the safety appliance act of March 2, 1893 (Act March 8, 1893, c. 196, 27 Stat. 531 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3174J), as amended April 1, 1896 (Act April 1, 1896, c. 87, 29 Stat. 85), and March 2, 1903 (Act March 2, 1903, c. 976, 32 Stat. 943 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 885]). The declaration contains four counts — one devoted to each of the alleged violations. A jury trial was had, at which a verdict was rendered against the defendant on each of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. DelkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Erie R. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BollingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
- United States v. YaquintaDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1962
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.