Balter v. Balter
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentCavanaugh, Judge
I agree with the Majority that the instant case was properly brought in the Family Division. However, because the appeal is interlocutory and should be quashed, I dissent.
I agree with the Majority’s statement that “if none of the questions raised on this appeal involve a question of jurisdiction, the appeal must be quashed.” The order appealed from is interlocutory; however, a statute provides for an immediate appeal from orders determining questions of jurisdiction. 12 P.S. § 672 (repealed effective June 27,1980). I also agree that the question of whether there is an adequate remedy at law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stein v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Heinz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Wormley EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.