Legal Opinion

Estate of King v. King

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 1898PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from, Linn District Court. — -Hon. H. M. Remley, Judge. This proceeding was instituted, primarily, to annul the letters of administration issued in said estate to the defendant B. King. The district court adjudged the appointment of King void, and canceled his commission. From this judgment the defendants appeal. There was also an appeal by plaintiffs from another branch of the court’s order, to which further reference will be hereafter made. —

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

— William E. King, a resident of Emmet county, in this state, was in the employ of defendant railway, and was killed in a collision on its road, caused, as is claimed, by the negligence of the railway company. King was unmarried. His sole heirs at law were his father and mother, who were living separate and apart. The mother’s home was in Blackhawk county, and the father was living in Benton county, in this state, at the time of the son’s death. The general offices of the railway company were in Cedar Rapids, in Linn county; and at the time of King’s death the company was indebted to him in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sitzman v. PacquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Estate of Moore v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Chase v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Erwin v. FillenwarthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Sullivan ex rel. Orton v. KenneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Iowa Public Service Co. v. RhodeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Fry v. FrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Ferguson v. ConnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API