Legal Opinion
State v. Franks
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 18, 2007No. 28076PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY W. BATES, Judge.
Evert Franks (Defendant) appeals from his conviction after a bench trial for driving while intoxicated in violation of § 577.010. 1 The only issue presented by Defendant’s appeal is whether the trial court erred in the admission of evidence at trial. Because the challenged evidence was cumulative of other properly-admitted evidence, this Court affirms.
Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Viewed in a light most favorable to the judgment, the following facts were adduced at trial. On February 25, 2005, Jennifer Wittman…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State v. MadorieSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. LopezMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BurksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. McLartyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Marlayna Kenney v. Kailey K. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.