Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1939No. 3426PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

Appellant, Charley Whitaker, cut ap-pellee Haynes with a knife inflicting serious injury, and Haynes brought this .action for damages. Plaintiff’s theory of the case was that he was sitting in his .automobile when the defendant came up to the car and without provocation cut him with a knife. The evidence showed that Haynes was sitting in his car in the town -of Douglas, Nacogdoches County, talking to one Jack Kelley, a nephew of defendant, when defendant Whitaker came up to the car and slashed him across the abdomen with a knife disemboweling him. Haynes’ testimony was that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Barrow v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  2. McMurrey Corp. v. YawnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Miller v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Vega v. GriegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Valence Operating Company v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API