Rufus Coleman v. Walter Johnston, Justin A. McGowan Kinzie Bluett and Frank G. Sain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.
By their motion to dismiss plaintiff Coleman’s complaint seeking redress under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, defendant police officers and warden, admitted all facts well pleaded. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. v. First Nat. Bank, 7 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 383, 384. Yet the district judge, erroneously we think, dismissed the cause because the complaint failed to state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act “for the reason that no deprivation of a Constitutional right is alleged.” Of course, under the applicable Rule of Federal Civil Procedure findings were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCollum v. MayfieldDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Geach v. MoynahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Chicago & North Western Ry. v. First Nat. Bank of WaukeganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
3Cited by60 opinions
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Carl C. Coppinger v. Gene Townsend, M.D., and Wayne K. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Charles Thomas v. Warden Frank J. Pate, Luther W. Miller v. Illinois Dept. Of Correction, Illinois State Penitentiary, Warden Frank j.pateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Billy Ray Stringer v. Robert DilgerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.