Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Paul

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1977No. KCD 28387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Judge.

Glenn Schmidt and Pauline Schmidt brought suit against Elmer J. Paul and Gertrude A. Paul, his wife, for damages resulting from mud and debris washing from the Paul property onto the Schmidt property. The trial court,, sitting without a jury, found in favor of Schmidt and awarded damages in the sum of $5,000.

On this appeal the Pauls contend (1) the judgment should not have been entered against Gertrude Paul because there was no evidence to show her husband acted as her agent or that she had otherwise actively caused the condition complained of; (2) the evidence does not support…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Bolin v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Mason v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Grogan v. Broadway Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Primm v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Massey v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Susan Chales and James Charles v. Ruth Latham and Ralph LathamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API