Legal Opinion

Gorzalkowski v. Gorzalkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In determining the equitable distribution of the parties’ assets and in setting a maintenance award, Supreme Court failed to set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its determinations (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [g]; [6] [b]). Although this Court may make its own findings, the record is not sufficiently developed to allow for intelligent appellate review (cf, Tarpinian v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duffy v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Diachuk v. DiachukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Norgauer v. NorgauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Tarpinian v. TarpinianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McPheeters v. McPheetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Garrison-Horgan v. HorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Gramatyka v. GramatykaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API