Legal Opinion

Smith v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1893No. 19153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

The complaint in this action substantially alleges that the board of supervisors of Los Angeles County, after a favorable election had for that purpose, duly authorized the issuance of three hundred bonds, in denominations of one thousand dollars each, bearing interest at the rate of five per cent per annum, for the erection of a county court-house; that said bonds were duly executed and delivered to the county *629treasurer for sale, and that he, in pursuance of law, thereafter advertised for and invited bids for said bonds; that no bona fide bid had been made for any of the bonds, and that no…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. House v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Theis v. Board of County Com'rs of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Weakley v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Burness v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Kennedy v. McInturffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API