Legal Opinion
Doe v. Hyland Therapeutics Division
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 1, 1992No. 92 Civ. 1802 (WCC), 92 Civ. 3381 (WCC)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:
These two cases arise from the tragic injuries sustained when a number of Irish patients suffering from congenital hemophilia were infused with blood products contaminated by the human immunodeficiency virus (“HIV”). Both cases are here on identical motions to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens. Plaintiff Mary C. Doe, a citizen and resident of Ireland, asserts a derivative cause of action against defendants for the pain, suffering, and wrongful death endured by her brother, James C. Doe, who received HIV-contaminated blood products in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Licci ex rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SALCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- U.S.O. Corp. v. Mizuho Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
- In Re Banco Santander Securities-Optimal LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.