Legal Opinion

United States v. Stewart

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 16, 2004No. 1:02-cr-00001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is a Motion For A New Trial And Arrest Of Judgment (D.I.192), an Amended Posh-Trial Motion (D.I.213) and a Second Supplemental Post-Trial Motion (D.I.219) filed by Defendant, Bruce K. Stewart. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will dismiss the motions as untimely, and in the alternative, deny the motions on the merits of the substantive claims raised therein.

BACKGROUND

I. Procedural Background

Defendant was indicted by the Grand Jury on ten counts involving a variety of drug and drug-related offenses, including: (1) conspiracy with…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Kevin Eugene WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FolinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Quintanilla v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  3. United States v. OnqueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API