Legal Opinion

Lucien v. Briley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2004No. 92922 RelPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman

Plaintiff, Rudolph Lucien, sought an order of habeas corpus, naming Kenneth R. Briley, warden of the State-ville Correctional Facility, as defendant. See 735 ILCS 5/10 — 101 et seq. (West 2000). Plaintiff alleged his extended-term sentence was unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), and he was therefore entitled to immediate release because he had served the maximum nonextended term to which he could have been sentenced. The circuit court of Will County held the statute authorizing Lucien’s extended-term sentence unconstitutional…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. MosleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In re M.I.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. McFaddenIllinois Supreme Court · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API