Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local 959 v. Wells
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1988No. S-1766PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS.
A. Facts.
At the time Teamsters Local 959 (Local or Local 959) went on strike against the Odom Company (Odom) in June 1981, Arlo Wells was a member of the Local; his wife, Donna Wells, was employed at Odom. She was a supervisor. He was a union truck driver working with K & W Trucking.
Soon after the strike against Odom began, Bruce Dove, a Local 959 business representative, contacted Arlo about Donna, who was operating a forklift in the Odom warehouse. Dove told Arlo that she should not be operating the forklift because it was a union…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. MendezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Cameron v. BeardAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WeifordAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Great Western Savings Bank v. George W. Easley Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.