Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Providence Washington Ins.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 2, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions
In Admiralty. Action on policy of marine insurance.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, District Judge.
This is an action on a policy of marine insurance. The Providence Washington Insurance Company, the respondent, by a policy dated May 19, 1894, insured William E. Ferguson, the libelant, the owner of the tug Governor, in the sum of $5,000, for one year, against “such loss or damage as the tug Governor may become legally liable for from any accident caused by collision or stranding.” The policy, in a later section, stated the contract more particularly as follows:
“This insurance is to fully indemnify the assured for loss and damage arising from or growing out of any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Connolly v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- The Thomas Purcell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marine Transit Corp. v. Northwestern Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- The MercerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Lesicich v. North River Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
- Ferguson v. Providence-Washington InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- Arundel Corp. v. Federal InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.