Legal Opinion

People v. Neville

Valley Stream Justice Court

Decided January 4, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert G. Bogle, J.

In a case that appears to be of first impression, the defendant, Victoria Neville, is charged with the use of a mobile telephone (cell phone) while operating a motor vehicle on a public street or highway. This is a violation under a New York State law that, for purposes of enforcement, took effect December 1, 2001 under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c (L 2001, ch 69). The defendant was served with a simplified traffic information on the date of the incident, returnable before this court.

According to the simplified traffic information, on December 11,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kass v. KassNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. ShackNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Asian Americans for Equality v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Mayflower Farms, Inc. v. Ten EyckSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API