Legal Opinion

Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. Harkey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 14, 2001No. 00-1348PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Based upon an asserted lack of venue, the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and certain commissioners (collectively referred to as “the Commission”) seek a writ of prohibition to stop the Stone County Chancery Court from hearing a complaint for declaratory judgment and for injunctive relief filed against the Commission and certain commissioners. The Commission argues that such an action must be brought in Pulaski County pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-60-103(3) (1987), which provides that all actions against state boards, state commissioners, or state officers on account…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Young v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. LindseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Wright v. KefferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. River Bar Farms, L.L.C. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH COM'N v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. HarkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API