United States v. Antonio Urrutia-Contreras
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GETTLEMAN, Senior District Judge:
Defendant-appellant Antonio UrrutiaContreras appeals from a 15 month sentence for violation of the terms of his supervised release, which was imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California to run consecutively to a 12 month sentence for illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and vacate the consecutive sentence and remand.
I
The procedural history in this case is unusual. In September 2011, after pleading guilty to a charge of illegal re-entry in the District of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Anthony EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Lorenzo EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Lorenzo EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Lorenzo EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Manuel BurciagaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.