Legal Opinion

United States v. Antonio Urrutia-Contreras

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 2015No. 14-50113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GETTLEMAN, Senior District Judge:

Defendant-appellant Antonio UrrutiaContreras appeals from a 15 month sentence for violation of the terms of his supervised release, which was imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California to run consecutively to a 12 month sentence for illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and vacate the consecutive sentence and remand.

I

The procedural history in this case is unusual. In September 2011, after pleading guilty to a charge of illegal re-entry in the District of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Lorenzo EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Lorenzo EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Lorenzo EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Manuel BurciagaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API