United States v. Tinghino
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*744MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action against the defendants, and makes this motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment, in order to reduce to judgment income tax assessments previously made against the taxpayers, as follows:
DOMINICK J. TINGHINO
Taxable Amounts of Date of Dates of
Period Assessments Assessment Notice & Demand
1962 $ 3,163.32 10/24/69 10/24/69
81.31
1,238.37
1962 19,020.10 5/ 4/70 5/ 4/70
11,091.71
8,047.85
1963 5,186.71 10/24/69 10/24/69
137.99
1,719.29
1963 47,657.17 5/ 4/70 5/ 4/70
26,421.94
17,305.42
1965…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chris D. Stoltzfus and Irma H. Stoltzfus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Bolen Webb and Cornelia Webb v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Harper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- United States v. RindskopfSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. Joseph G. LeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zeno v. CropperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- United States v. Waite, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979