Legal Opinion

Territory v. Benoit

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1810PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The Grand Jury had found an Indictment against the defendant for an assault with intent to murder, which is a capital offence. ,. ,.. , ,. , , Derbigny moved to have him bailed.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

It cannot be done. Bail is never allowed in offences punishable by death, when the proof is evident or the presumption great. On a Coroner’s inquest finding a person guilty of a capital crime, the Judges have often looked into the testimony which the Coroner is bound to record, and when they have been of opinion that the jurors had drawn an illogical conclusion, admitted the party to bail. But as the evidence before the Grand Jury is not written and cannot be disclosed, the same discretion and control cannot be exercised, and the judges cannot help considering the finding of the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Tinder & SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Ex parte BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. United States v. Jesus Perez GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. State ex rel. Hunter v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  5. United States v. Jaylan Miles Ra Shawn GoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API