Shockome v. Shockome
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*619In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an amended order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated December 29, 2006, as, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition to suspend her telephone contact and visitation with the subject children to the extent of suspending her telephone contact until she complied with certain of the court’s prior orders, and denied that branch of her application which was for unsupervised visitation in New York.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. McGlincheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Posporelis v. PosporelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Ammirata v. AmmirataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Fletcher v. FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Waldman v. WaldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Balgley v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Riedel v. RiedelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rambali v. RambaliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hermanowski v. HermanowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Procopio v. ProcopioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.