Legal Opinion

Cisco & N. E. Ry. Co. v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1924No. 10851. [fn*]Published

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

This is an action instituted by-Mrs. Emma Proctor in her own behalf, and as next friend of her six minor children, and for the benefit of W. T. Proctor, plaintiff’s stepson and the son of the deceased, and for the benefit of Mrs. Leona Brown, wife of John Brown, and daughter of the deceased against the receivers of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company and the Cisco & Northeastern Railway Company, for damages on account of the death of J. E. Proctor, husband of Mrs. Emma Proctor and father of the other plaintiffs.

It was alleged in plaintiffs’ petition that said J. E. Proctor on, to wit, the 9th…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. International & Great Northern Railroad v. HallorenTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Boyles v. McClureTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API