Legal Opinion

Melbert v. Compsource Oklahoma

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 2014No. 14-356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

|,The claimant, Kevin Melbert, appeals the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC) which dismissed his claims against the employer’s insurer, CompSource Oklahoma, on the basis that the insurance policy did not provide coverage to employees injured in Louisiana under the facts of this case. Finding no error on the part of the OWC, we affirm.

I

ISSUES

We must determine whether the trial court erred in finding that no workers’ compensation coverage existed in favor of the claimant under the Oklahoma policy.

II

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mr. Melbert, a resident…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. La. Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Bannon v. Moriah Techs., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. O'Bannon v. Moriah Technologies, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API