Rehberg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The conspiracy charged in the indictment was proved without fatal variance. Church was sufficiently shown to have been a conspirator rather than a mere buyer from them. There was no such confusion in the case as to require the Judge to charge without request as in Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 90 L.Ed. 1557, as explained in Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 68 S.Ct. 248. The prosecution for violating Sugar Rationing Regulations was not abated by expiration of the Statute authorizing the Regulations. Carter et al. v. United States, 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 684, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Olie Duane Jones, Sr., and Lemuel H. StockmarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. ClaytonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971