Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Carrow

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1916No. Civil No. 1449PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Mohave. Carl G. Krook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The appellant’s objections to the sufficiency of the complaint are without merit, and raise no novel questions. We doubt if another complaint will again be presented to the court following the form of this complaint, yet, it states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The cause of action is based upon the defendant’s alleged negligent killing of plaintiffs’ livestock, range animals, by running locomotives, cars or trains over such animals. The specific acts of negligence relied upon are charged to have arisen: First, from defendant’s failure to maintain sufficient fences to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Payne v. CliffordArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CarrowArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CarrowArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Mosher v. BellasArizona Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API