Wright v. Asbury (In Re Asbury)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DISMISSING COMPLAINTS OBJECTING TO DISCHARGE AND TO DETERMINE DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT
JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, Bankruptcy Judge.
In 1992, the plaintiffs filed a complaint, an amended complaint, and a second amended complaint to determine dis-chargeability of debt, which this Court dismissed at trial because the evidence related solely to the general denial of a discharge in bankruptcy, but it was too late to amend the complaint because the deadline had passed for bringing complaints objecting to discharge. See Wright v. As bury, Adversary Proceeding No. 92-5257-JS. After the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In the Matter of Southmark Corporation, Debtor. Southmark Corporation v. Schulte Roth & ZabelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Toth v. Ham (In Re Ham)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1994
- In Re JeffreyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re NowinskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Durns v. Dawson (In Re Dawson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Allfirst Bank v. Lewis (In Re Lewis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Security First Bank v. Deitz (In Re Deitz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2009