Ex parte Westerfield
California Supreme Court
Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
Myrick, J.:
The petitioner is in the custody of the Chief of Police of the City and County of San Francisco, under a warrant charging a misdemeanor under an act entitled “An Act to regulate and provide for a day of rest in certain cases,” approved April IGtli, 1880. (Stat. 1880, p. 80.)
The act provides that “ it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in the business of baking to engage, or pérmit others in his employ to engage, in the labor of baking, for the purpose of sale, between the hours of 6 o’clock p. Sr. on Saturday and 6 o’clock P. M. on Sunday, except in the setting of sponge…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- State v. GoodwillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Carnegie Natural Gas Co. v. SwigerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.