Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Global Enercom Management, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this case, we must determine whether two exclusions in insurance policies — “auto use” and “subsequent-to-execution” — preclude coverage for a subcontractor’s workers who fell and died after being hoisted up on a rope through a pulley system by a pickup truck. The subcontracts for which the insurance policies allegedly provided coverage were signed after the work had begun. The trial court and court of appeals held that neither exclusion applied and granted summary judgment to the policyholder, declaring coverage under both policies. 293 S.W.3d 322, 325, 328 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.]…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Patient Advocates of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- State Farm Life Insurance Co v. BeastonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development & Research Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- The City of Houston v. Steve WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. ReitzTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Phillips v. Carlton Energy Group, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Liverman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Clear Lake Center, L.P. v. Garden Ridge, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.