Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State of W.Va. ex rel. Biafore v. Earl Ray Tomblin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2016No. 16-0013Published

1ConcurrenceLoughry, Justice

While courts are occasionally called upon to resolve a legal issue at the heart of a political dispute, neither this Court nor any court is constituted for the purpose of being played as a political trump card. Here, the petitioner Democratic Party alleges a lack of clarity in a statute that is perfectly clear. In fact, the clarity with which the subject statute addresses the precise issue presented leads to the inescapable conclusion that this extraordinary proceeding is a thinly-veiled attempt to bait the members of this Court into a partisan resolution. I am reassured that a majority of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EpperlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Martin v. Randolph County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Frazier v. MeadowsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wilson v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API