Legal Opinion

State v. Rutley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 2005No. 0201-30039, A120670PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating ORS 475.999 by delivering a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the state had to prove defendant’s culpable mental state with respect to the distance element of the offense and to the trial court’s refusal so to instruct the jury. We hold that proof of a culpable mental state was necessary and that the trial court erred in failing so to instruct the jury. Because the record contains sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BlantonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. Chang Hwan ChoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. EngenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. Van NorsdallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RutleyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. ProphetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. BarboeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API