Legal Opinion

Arrowhead Alternator, Inc. v. CIT Communications Finance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 12, 2004No. A04A1089PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

Arrowhead Alternator, Inc. and James Kalina (collectively, “Arrowhead”) appeal from an October 20, 2003 judgment of the Superior Court of Clayton County ordering Arrowhead to pay $67,204.61 to CIT Communications Finance Corporation (“CIT”). Because the October 20, 2003 judgment was void ab initio as a second judgment between the same parties in the same suit, and Arrowhead should have filed an application from the only appealable decision, the October 15, 2003 order denying the motion to set aside, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

On February 21, 2003, CIT…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Okekpe v. Commerce Funding Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Arnold v. BRUNDIDGE BANKING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Hammette v. EickemeyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Mendenhall v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Department of Human Resources v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lemcon USA Corp. v. Icon Technology Consulting, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Threatt v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Luster v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Noaha, LLC v. Vista Antiques & Persian Rugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Rogers v. Estate of HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API